|
Post by aDave on Mar 13, 2019 16:53:05 GMT -5
I just changed it to "Michigan Rocks". Thanks for the help, everyone. Do you know how long it will take to show up in You Tube search results? I just searched for "Michigan Rocks" (no quotes), and your channel did not populate in the results. Interestingly, a search for your old channel name (jugglerguy1) brings your channel right up under that old name.
|
|
|
Post by Jugglerguy on Mar 13, 2019 17:27:13 GMT -5
I just changed it to "Michigan Rocks". Thanks for the help, everyone. Do you know how long it will take to show up in You Tube search results? I just searched for "Michigan Rocks" (no quotes), and your channel did not populate in the results. Interestingly, a search for your old channel name (jugglerguy1) brings your channel right up under that old name. I have no idea. I have noticed very irregular results in statistics from YouTube. For example, if I pull up my channel on YouTube and look at the number of views for a video I get one result, but if I look under analytics, I’ll get an older or newer number, and the YouTube Studio app on my iPad might be different than those. So some parts of YouTube update at different times. I would expect my new name to come up in search results within a day or two.
|
|
|
Post by aDave on Mar 13, 2019 18:14:02 GMT -5
Do you know how long it will take to show up in You Tube search results? I just searched for "Michigan Rocks" (no quotes), and your channel did not populate in the results. Interestingly, a search for your old channel name (jugglerguy1) brings your channel right up under that old name. I have no idea. I have noticed very irregular results in statistics from YouTube. For example, if I pull up my channel on YouTube and look at the number of views for a video I get one result, but if I look under analytics, I’ll get an older or newer number, and the YouTube Studio app on my iPad might be different than those. So some parts of YouTube update at different times. I would expect my new name to come up in search results within a day or two. Thanks, Rob. I hope the name change works out well for you.
|
|
|
Post by Jugglerguy on Mar 13, 2019 20:09:10 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by aDave on Mar 13, 2019 20:19:11 GMT -5
Wow, tough question. I like them both. If you want to solely focus on rock related stuff, I'd go with the Petoskey image. If you want to post vids about rock related stuff AND all things cool about how Michigan "Rocks," then I might lean toward the second one. Now that I think about it, I'm liking the Petoskey image. But, can you create a collage of different stuff? Heck, I'm just throwing stuff against the wall to see what sticks.
ETA: Wait, there are three images. Same thought process, but between the two Petoskey images, I like the one without text.
|
|
lookatthat
Cave Dweller
Whatever there is to be found.
Member since May 2017
Posts: 1,360
|
Post by lookatthat on Mar 13, 2019 20:21:13 GMT -5
i think i like the top one best. The one with the pretty scenery is too generic.
|
|
|
Post by Garage Rocker on Mar 13, 2019 22:04:21 GMT -5
I like the third option best. Might as well see those Petoskey's in their full glory.
|
|
quartz
Cave Dweller
breakin' rocks in the hot sun
Member since February 2010
Posts: 3,339
|
Post by quartz on Mar 13, 2019 23:18:43 GMT -5
I agree, #3
|
|
|
Post by fernwood on Mar 14, 2019 5:17:40 GMT -5
3
|
|
romo
starting to spend too much on rocks
Member since September 2018
Posts: 104
|
Post by romo on Mar 14, 2019 6:17:29 GMT -5
3 really does stand out and catch the eye
|
|
|
Post by Jugglerguy on Mar 14, 2019 8:28:10 GMT -5
Shoot. It took me about three hours to find the right tutorial to help me do the first two. The third one is what I had up already. I’m glad I asked for opinions, because my intuition was way off. Thanks again everyone.
|
|
|
Post by rockjunquie on Mar 14, 2019 8:40:58 GMT -5
I actually like the first one and I think it looks more "professional".
|
|
|
Post by hummingbirdstones on Mar 14, 2019 9:05:01 GMT -5
Hi Rob,
I'm a little late to this one, but I agree with Tela. I like the first one, too, but I think I would like it better if the transparency on the picture was lowered. Still transparent, but not as much so you could see the picture a bit better and then the printing either not transparent at all -- maybe a dark grey so it stands out but also blends in.
|
|
|
Post by MsAli on Mar 14, 2019 9:31:13 GMT -5
Hi Rob,
I'm a little late to this one, but I agree with Tela. I like the first one, too, but I think I would like it better if the transparency on the picture was lowered. Still transparent, but not as much so you could see the picture a bit better and then the printing either not transparent at all -- maybe a dark grey so it stands out but also blends in.
|
|
|
Post by Jugglerguy on Mar 14, 2019 10:22:59 GMT -5
Hi Rob, I'm a little late to this one, but I agree with Tela. I like the first one, too, but I think I would like it better if the transparency on the picture was lowered. Still transparent, but not as much so you could see the picture a bit better and then the printing either not transparent at all -- maybe a dark grey so it stands out but also blends in.
Like this?
|
|
|
Post by MsAli on Mar 14, 2019 10:25:20 GMT -5
That looks good
|
|
lookatthat
Cave Dweller
Whatever there is to be found.
Member since May 2017
Posts: 1,360
|
Post by lookatthat on Mar 14, 2019 10:27:40 GMT -5
I like the petoskies, but can you make the words a little darker?
|
|
|
Post by rockjunquie on Mar 14, 2019 10:38:35 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Jugglerguy on Mar 14, 2019 10:40:08 GMT -5
I like the petoskies, but can you make the words a little darker? Gee, you're kind of demanding. Just kidding, I'm loving the help. This is 14 darker. I can go more.
|
|
|
Post by rockjunquie on Mar 14, 2019 10:50:51 GMT -5
A smidgen darker should be just right.
|
|