spiritstone
Cave Dweller
Member since August 2014
Posts: 2,061
|
Post by spiritstone on May 2, 2016 14:49:25 GMT -5
I read that to mean that one can not do as one wishes with their body without considering the other "owner's" wishes. For example, one can't go out and get action on the side because his/her body also belongs to their partner. Relevant concept taken from that angle. LOL, proceed at own risk. Such 'wisdom' not covered, common sense prevails. Ex. Lorena Bobbit
|
|
jamesp
Cave Dweller
Member since October 2012
Posts: 36,159
|
Post by jamesp on May 2, 2016 16:52:53 GMT -5
Reality at this hacienda spiritstone. She left no doubt about the situation; a lady that knows what she wants lol. She looks well practiced at such retort.
|
|
|
Post by mohs on May 2, 2016 17:46:52 GMT -5
we can say that's not a gay marriage
mostly
|
|
geezer
spending too much on rocks
Member since April 2016
Posts: 338
|
Post by geezer on May 2, 2016 18:34:43 GMT -5
If ignorance is bliss, then there's too many people in Washington having an orgasm.
|
|
wampidytoo
has rocks in the head
Add 5016 to my post count.
Member since June 2013
Posts: 709
|
Post by wampidytoo on May 2, 2016 20:39:42 GMT -5
--Strange that he would live one way and advise to live 180 degrees out.-- After reading his thoughts on say the lady subject I believed that he experienced what was said of him. Some subjects only a man can understand. And his male perspective sounded bang on. By the same token his knowledge will put you on some if that is what you want. Glad you key pointed the 180 thing. Not to sure sex has much to do with liberal/conservative left/right religious/non-religous. Kinda dances to it's own drummer. Approach your next lady with this approach(if you haven't already): " The wife's body does not belong to her alone but also to her husband. In the same way, the husband's body does not belong to him alone but also to his wife." I guess that means that if one or the other is not in the mood you best get in the mood. Male or female. Curious concept. Strange concept to me unless it is translated to "no means no". I have lived by the rule that no means no whether it is wife, girlfriend or stranger and have never veered off that course. It is a matter of respecting the other's wishes. If I do not feel like it (really, it has happened ) and turned it down why should it be any different for her. A friend of my wife told us about her husband poking her in the back with his finger until she gave in or went ballistic. How romantic is that? hahaha The marriage did not last very long after that started. Jim
|
|
jamesp
Cave Dweller
Member since October 2012
Posts: 36,159
|
Post by jamesp on May 2, 2016 21:18:20 GMT -5
Yea, mood/desire/interest is of primary importance. Or why bother. Mutual interest in satisfying each other helps.
|
|
captrandom
off to a rocking start
Member since April 2016
Posts: 3
|
Post by captrandom on May 3, 2016 4:21:59 GMT -5
Just my 2 cents. (while buzzed) The founding fathers gave us a great start, and i'm sure they are spinning in their graves right now. First, we need to understand the difference between a democracy and a republic. If you have the time, check out www.lexrex.com/enlightened/AmericanIdeal/aspects/demrep.htmlSo basically a democracy was argued as tyranny by the majority, while a republic was to be safeguard constitutional law and the mnority. Our house of rep's would be considered a democracy where how ever hundred there are + 1 could enact any idiotic law they wanted, but the brilliance of the founders was the Senate. Originally, they were elected by their respective state legislators <per the framers>, but now they have 6 year terms. The Senate was intended to be a stop-gap; a true Republican ideal to counter any excess of the House of Rep's. Unfortunately, that intended died before I was born. Im a history nerd, but not brilliant enough to go past my BS from college, but I look at out government now and it is in no way shape or form what it was intended to be. I like to say we are in an era of Corptacry. We are supposed to be patriotic for our sons and neighbors in the war on terror, but multinationals jumps countries faster then a 1000$ hooker. We failed as a republic. And I feel that the true evolution of a democracy forms fascism. 3%
|
|
jamesp
Cave Dweller
Member since October 2012
Posts: 36,159
|
Post by jamesp on May 3, 2016 7:29:53 GMT -5
Welcome to the forum captrandom. Unfortunately admission to failure seems to be an item swept under the rug. Walmart vs small store USA. Oversea products vs US products. Cheaper prices for people in a poor economy due to corporate super efficiency at the cost of US jobs. A vicious circle. Powerful corporations have turned us into slaves and indentured servants. Pawns. Power and money in the hands of a small group. Free enterprise apparently makes it all legal. Talk about killing morale. Bailouts shed light to the entire country in cap letters. In yo face. Shrewd corporations. Impressive but destructive strategy. Forefather Thomas Jefferson: " Thomas Jefferson, one of the founders of the United States democratic system, said "I hope we shall take warning from the example and crush in its birth the aristocracy of our monied corporations which dare already to challenge our government to a trial of strength, and to bid defiance to the laws of their country." Later years: [3] Franklin D. Roosevelt, in an April 29, 1938 message to Congress, warned that the growth of private power could lead to fascism: [T]he liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than their democratic state itself. That, in its essence, is fascism—ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling private power.[4][5][6] [...] Statistics of the Bureau of Internal Revenue reveal the following amazing figures for 1935: "Ownership of corporate assets: Of all corporations reporting from every part of the Nation, one-tenth of 1 percent of them owned 52 percent of the assets of all of them."[4][6] Dwight D. Eisenhower criticized the notion of the confluence of corporate power and de facto fascism,[7] but nevertheless brought attention to the "conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry"[8] in his 1961 Farewell Address to the Nation, and stressed "the need to maintain balance in and among national programs -- balance between the private and the public economy, balance between cost and hoped for advantage."[8]" Read more en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_capitalism
|
|
|
Post by captbob on May 3, 2016 8:39:35 GMT -5
Captain Random? That name took a bit too much thought, doubt it's mere coincidence, and that's one heck of a first post on a rock forum. Wonder who he/she is also... Nice first post, welcome to the forum captrandom and 3% should be plenty - again!
|
|
wampidytoo
has rocks in the head
Add 5016 to my post count.
Member since June 2013
Posts: 709
|
Post by wampidytoo on May 3, 2016 11:39:49 GMT -5
Welcome to the forum captrandom. Unfortunately admission to failure seems to be an item swept under the rug. Walmart vs small store USA. Oversea products vs US products. Cheaper prices for people in a poor economy due to corporate super efficiency at the cost of US jobs. A vicious circle. Powerful corporations have turned us into slaves and indentured servants. Pawns. Power and money in the hands of a small group. Free enterprise apparently makes it all legal. Talk about killing morale. Bailouts shed light to the entire country in cap letters. In yo face. Shrewd corporations. Impressive but destructive strategy. Forefather Thomas Jefferson: " Thomas Jefferson, one of the founders of the United States democratic system, said "I hope we shall take warning from the example and crush in its birth the aristocracy of our monied corporations which dare already to challenge our government to a trial of strength, and to bid defiance to the laws of their country." Later years: [3] Franklin D. Roosevelt, in an April 29, 1938 message to Congress, warned that the growth of private power could lead to fascism: [T]he liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than their democratic state itself. That, in its essence, is fascism—ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling private power.[4][5][6] [...] Statistics of the Bureau of Internal Revenue reveal the following amazing figures for 1935: "Ownership of corporate assets: Of all corporations reporting from every part of the Nation, one-tenth of 1 percent of them owned 52 percent of the assets of all of them."[4][6] Dwight D. Eisenhower criticized the notion of the confluence of corporate power and de facto fascism,[7] but nevertheless brought attention to the "conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry"[8] in his 1961 Farewell Address to the Nation, and stressed "the need to maintain balance in and among national programs -- balance between the private and the public economy, balance between cost and hoped for advantage."[8]" Read more en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_capitalismAgain my lack of eloquence had defeated me. I have been trying to point this out for what seems like forever but have not been able to get my point across. Your post hit the proverbial nail on the head and I thank you for that. If people would start watching a few documentaries instead of the trash that is on TV now days it would be very enlightening but who wants to watch something educational when they can watch a woman with a grotesque butt and her family. Part three of the documentary zeitgeist:themovie covers this quite well but it may give you one of the "I am mad as hell and I am not going to take it any more" moments even though there is little that can be done to prevent it now. Corporations and the uber rich own the government now and actually have for quite a while. A lot of people get their panties in a bunch over the elections and it doesn't make a hell of a lot of difference who gets in because they are all bought and paid for. Well, all but Bernie but it is getting down to, a snow flake in hell, deal for him. The college that has correctly predicted the outcome of every presidential election for the last 120 years are probably looking at their first loss because they predicted Bernie this time. Very few win all the time and by far this is the craziest election I have ever taken part in. Jim
|
|
jamesp
Cave Dweller
Member since October 2012
Posts: 36,159
|
Post by jamesp on May 3, 2016 12:57:04 GMT -5
The corporate arrangement is alive and well and influencing our government and population. No denying that. Liberal/non-liberal, a non-issue. Artillery against the conservatives, what ever. It is what it is. Amazed that T. Jefferson called that out so long ago. By the same token bailouts necessary to avoid a likely worse scenario. Clever corporate strategy, I think so. Can't blame them, free enterprise sharpens creativity. captrandom, are you out there ? LOL.
|
|
jamesp
Cave Dweller
Member since October 2012
Posts: 36,159
|
Post by jamesp on May 3, 2016 14:24:46 GMT -5
Captain Random? That name took a bit too much thought, doubt it's mere coincidence, and that's one heck of a first post on a rock forum. Wonder who he/she is also... Nice first post, welcome to the forum captrandom and 3% should be plenty - again! I was raised to respect my elders Bob. Looks like my respect has been taken advantage of. Used as a tool of vengeance apparently. My apologies.
|
|
captrandom
off to a rocking start
Member since April 2016
Posts: 3
|
Post by captrandom on May 4, 2016 3:46:29 GMT -5
Captain Random? That name took a bit too much thought, doubt it's mere coincidence, and that's one heck of a first post on a rock forum. Wonder who he/she is also... Nice first post, welcome to the forum captrandom and 3% should be plenty - again! Hey... actually it was a nick-name given to me in high school. Every so often I would go off on an odd tangent and *blammo* the nick name stuck. Ive been using it ever since for general email addy's and such, however in regards to all the stolen valor bastards out there I will change my log in if it offends anyone who served. I mean absolutely no disrespect to the Military as have never served. Anywho, thanks for the welcome. Usually I never talk about politics since its a debate you can never win, but last night after a few I just felt like letting loose.
|
|
captrandom
off to a rocking start
Member since April 2016
Posts: 3
|
Post by captrandom on May 4, 2016 3:53:35 GMT -5
Welcome to the forum captrandom . Unfortunately admission to failure seems to be an item swept under the rug. Walmart vs small store USA. Oversea products vs US products. Cheaper prices for people in a poor economy due to corporate super efficiency at the cost of US jobs. A vicious circle. Powerful corporations have turned us into slaves and indentured servants. Pawns. Power and money in the hands of a small group. Free enterprise apparently makes it all legal. ...I agree with everything above. While ma baked apple pie's for the boys coming home, pa signed away every trade deal he could.
|
|
jamesp
Cave Dweller
Member since October 2012
Posts: 36,159
|
Post by jamesp on May 4, 2016 6:53:26 GMT -5
Masquerades, male seduction, probably Pedophilia comes to mind. Demons within, lol. Have another drink. Find another victim.
|
|
|
Post by 1dave on May 4, 2016 10:31:41 GMT -5
From another thread but very important. What makes us a country? Our LAWS and our BORDERS. Without those two, we cease being a country. The most important thing we have to do to protect ourselves RIGHT NOW is to stop any practice of foreign law in the US!From the Hadiths: The laws of Islam tell them THEY can't stay if WE won't allow them to practice their horrific laws. [/quote]
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Member since January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 4, 2016 15:07:02 GMT -5
1dave"If he comes to have family and relatives around him and is able to display his religion" he cannot leave!!!! The exact opposite of the point you are trying to make, in the words you posted. You are so desperately trying to spread your word..... Forest|Trees Finish reading your own post! I thought captrandom was Bob!
|
|
|
Post by 1dave on May 5, 2016 8:26:02 GMT -5
1dave"If he comes to have family and relatives around him and is able to display his religion" he cannot leave!!!! The exact opposite of the point you are trying to make, in the words you posted. You are so desperately trying to spread your word..... Forest|Trees Finish reading your own post! I thought captrandom was Bob! THAT is part of their plan of conquest that has worked for over a thousand years and holds the KEY to stop them from taking over OUR country. HERE it has already worked on Dearborn Michigan so it is getting closer and closer to you. Keep your head in the sand. I don't have anymore time to waste with you on this subject.
|
|
jamesp
Cave Dweller
Member since October 2012
Posts: 36,159
|
Post by jamesp on May 5, 2016 10:32:46 GMT -5
1dave, Islam subject has been beaten to death. I still think that the Islam's impact on the US will be in the form of controlling oil. Those guys know to target our weak areas. The percentage of them that are terroristic no doubt are targeting our weak areas. Baptist and Catholic terroristic groups have not had so much of an impact on the US lol.(make comparison please) Special focus on that Islam percentage. Devastating on our economy. Serious force to be reckoned with. We have no choice but to focus on this group. It is common sense. Islam of any sect or form. Any other viewpoint is illogical. Two primary religions, Christian and Islam in this world. Unfortunately they are in opposition. Can't get simpler than that. I agree with every point you made. To say that discrimination is being waged against the Islamic population is just rabble rousing. rabble rousing adjective 1. of, relating to, or characteristic of a rabble-rouser. noun 2. an instance or the practice of stirring up the passions or prejudices of the public. This rabble rousing is effective on conservatives, intention is to boil their blood so to speak. Defending outrageous concepts. Profiling rabble rousers reveals big egos, those in need of attention, seducers, unrealistic mindsets, gang mentality and just plain shit stirrers. Often straddling the fence till they lull you into a trap. Forcing you into orations of proof and steering you into controversy. Constructive debate results. Reaffirming your beliefs as the debate proceeds. Popular trend, people get tired of fundamental rules that make for the best civilization. When life is rich and abundant civilizations about always go the more liberal direction. Human nature. As a civilization becomes liberal the party catches up with reality and is often too late. Islam despises our ways and our wealth. They will not rest until they have fulfilled their religious motivations. Read their mission statement, it is not a secret. Many will die for their cause(religious motivation). But all this has been discussed in detail on this forum. Old hat.
|
|