jamesp
Cave Dweller
Member since October 2012
Posts: 36,601
|
Post by jamesp on Mar 16, 2014 20:20:23 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Member since January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 16, 2014 21:43:58 GMT -5
Looks like the cross sections of tiny oranges.beautiful
|
|
quartz
Cave Dweller
breakin' rocks in the hot sun
Member since February 2010
Posts: 3,359
|
Post by quartz on Mar 16, 2014 22:07:24 GMT -5
An interesting pattern and nice color combination, thanks for pics.
|
|
Sabre52
Cave Dweller
Me and my gal, Rosie
Member since August 2005
Posts: 20,492
|
Post by Sabre52 on Mar 17, 2014 8:20:54 GMT -5
Wow, great color and polyp patterns on that one....Mel
|
|
Fossilman
Cave Dweller
Member since January 2009
Posts: 20,718
|
Post by Fossilman on Mar 17, 2014 9:09:37 GMT -5
Totally cool!!!!
|
|
junglejim
spending too much on rocks
Member since January 2014
Posts: 344
|
Post by junglejim on Mar 17, 2014 10:30:04 GMT -5
I really like the corals, very cool. Keep them coming.
|
|
jamesp
Cave Dweller
Member since October 2012
Posts: 36,601
|
Post by jamesp on Mar 17, 2014 11:13:45 GMT -5
Thanks you guys. Yes Jim, I probably will-ha,wear out my welcome. I have a coral fetish. sick, eh ?
|
|
grayfingers
Cave Dweller
Member since November 2007
Posts: 4,575
|
Post by grayfingers on Mar 17, 2014 12:17:41 GMT -5
That color and pattern is most pleasing. Looks like a different specie that the (family?) of corals you usually find. The corallites look larger too, no? I wonder what are the little squarish ares between the corallites.
|
|
jamesp
Cave Dweller
Member since October 2012
Posts: 36,601
|
Post by jamesp on Mar 17, 2014 14:00:31 GMT -5
That does have large corallites Bill. About two times bigger in diameter. This coral that has the squarish areas between the corallites seem to replace better showing the corallites. Even the rind still shows the corallites in eroded shape like skeletons. So you can ID this type easily by looking at the rind. I will have to study theses patterns between the corallites; they are typical of Indonesian corals. As is the larger corallites. I may find a whole reef of them. Since the coral comes in large groupings....As one shoal may be loaded w/a lot of nice silicified patterns. When it rains it often pours so to speak.
|
|
jamesp
Cave Dweller
Member since October 2012
Posts: 36,601
|
Post by jamesp on Mar 17, 2014 14:01:02 GMT -5
That does have large corallites Bill. About two times bigger in diameter. This coral that has the squarish areas between the corallites seem to replace better showing the corallites. Even the rind still shows the corallites in eroded shape like skeletons. So you can ID this type easily by looking at the rind. I will have to study theses patterns between the corallites; they are typical of Indonesian corals. As is the larger corallites. I may find a whole reef of them. Since the coral comes in large groupings....As one shoal may be loaded w/a lot of nice silicified patterns. When it rains it often pours so to speak. You can see how the skin/rind is corallite skeletons. Similar material..
|
|
quartz
Cave Dweller
breakin' rocks in the hot sun
Member since February 2010
Posts: 3,359
|
Post by quartz on Mar 17, 2014 22:04:12 GMT -5
Coral fetish, no I don't think so. Sick, well??? I think we all here appreciate the opportunity to share in your collection of a material not available to the majority of us, be it in picture or possession, thanks to your time investment and generosity. Larry
|
|
jamesp
Cave Dweller
Member since October 2012
Posts: 36,601
|
Post by jamesp on Mar 17, 2014 22:18:33 GMT -5
I see the lava. Man does it produce a lot of Sunstone crystals. By volume almost 1/2 ! The guy is down 40 feet ? Track hoe? Or tunnel? That material has the mother load potential. Both in size or color or both. That is addictive. Sounds like great 14 hour days of pleasure. The lava part looks the same as a covering they put on athletic running tracks, like 1/4 mile track. Who wouldn't want to find this stuff. Like the word 'schillers'
|
|
jamesp
Cave Dweller
Member since October 2012
Posts: 36,601
|
Post by jamesp on Mar 17, 2014 22:33:40 GMT -5
Coral fetish, no I don't think so. Sick, well??? I think we all here appreciate the opportunity to share in your collection of a material not available to the majority of us, be it in picture or possession, thanks to your time investment and generosity. Larry and the McDermitt is exceptional. I will be sawing them to cube shapes and getting them in the tumbler. Crazy about the McDermitt. Have had a few cubes running hard w/the coral. Darn things are gonna be round. It would actually make fine spheres.
|
|
quartz
Cave Dweller
breakin' rocks in the hot sun
Member since February 2010
Posts: 3,359
|
Post by quartz on Mar 18, 2014 12:17:45 GMT -5
Surprised you got that pkg. so quick, glad you like it. I wish we could have sent you some better schillers, but all but two pieces we found were very small this time, and one of the bigger pieces was only about 1/8 thick. Did about 3.2% schillers by weight, but not good for size. Maybe next trip. Everything down there is open pit, the deep ones are ramped for excavator or hoe access once beyond surface reach. The pic. you put up is way "flowered up", that is mined stuff, and probably a good amount of mtl. processed to find them. We did find two pieces in our sort that had a bit of green in them, one 3ct., the other 3.5ct. The only color we ever found. Fortunate to find these on the surface. Pleased that you like the McDermitt wood, a little trading gets us both some very unique to each of us, and enjoyable stuff. Larry
|
|
jamesp
Cave Dweller
Member since October 2012
Posts: 36,601
|
Post by jamesp on Mar 18, 2014 15:56:32 GMT -5
How thick is that lava layer? And is it still where it was when it cooled or did it get lifted or shifted ? Those McDermitts are some solid ones. Any theory on what kind of wood it is ?
|
|
quartz
Cave Dweller
breakin' rocks in the hot sun
Member since February 2010
Posts: 3,359
|
Post by quartz on Mar 18, 2014 22:25:02 GMT -5
The lava layer varies from inches to about four feet [in known areas] thick. It lays where it flowed, and was submerged for probably centuries as the bottom of a really big lake, or inland sea. This is in the area called The Great Basin. Odd to see water worn rocks out there. The old water lines are visible part way up on the surrounding hills. We have never studied the origins of the McDermitt wood, or heard theories from others. Likely someone on the forum has some ideas about it.
|
|
jamesp
Cave Dweller
Member since October 2012
Posts: 36,601
|
Post by jamesp on Mar 19, 2014 6:38:00 GMT -5
The lava layer varies from inches to about four feet [in known areas] thick. It lays where it flowed, and was submerged for probably centuries as the bottom of a really big lake, or inland sea. This is in the area called The Great Basin. Odd to see water worn rocks out there. The old water lines are visible part way up on the surrounding hills. We have never studied the origins of the McDermitt wood, or heard theories from others. Likely someone on the forum has some ideas about it. I want to look at The Great Basin on topo and see it's boundaries. Like to look at water lines. Maybe get a view of the shore on Google Earth. Looks like you must remove over burden to get to the lava layer? Or are there washes that cut thru it? I would guess the 4 foot thick layer has the bigger sunstones? I have started looking at elevations to find coral and struck gold. The coral seems to be around 90-110 above sea level. If the river cuts thru a slope that has that elevation in it's grade i find occasional coral down in the river. If the river cuts thru a flat topped plateau at around 90-110 elevation i find a lot of coral down in the river. Looks like the coral thrived at 90-110. So using a topo map allows me to nail coral habitat. Making sense? The plateau was probably loaded up w/reefs. One river is at 40. When it cut/undermined thru the 90-110 elevation the reef capping it at that optimum coral habitat it came rolling down in the river and washed all the sand leaving rock(coral) bars in the river. So the coral is everyhere in a plataeu cut verses a slope cut. If the river cuts thru 85 feet or lower i never find a single coral. Of 12 miles of this river there are about 6 little spots where it cuts thru the 90-110 elevation and coral is at all of them. They are random and piled and broke apart from their original connected state. The other river passes thru the coral at about 87 feet. In that river the coral is often still connected in 5-10 foot sections still interlocked since it did not fall far from it's original reef position. The type of coral i find is typical of shallow water corralite structure. The geologists do not seem to mention an ancient sea at 110 elevation. If i go higher than 110 there is no coral. The phosphate mine sorrounds the coral bearing area and is open strip mined. I can drive for miles in their tailings and have never found a single coral at that elevation. Of course, I am just looking for coral and am not to concerned about the theories of geology. But the coral may have a story to tell.
|
|
grayfingers
Cave Dweller
Member since November 2007
Posts: 4,575
|
Post by grayfingers on Mar 19, 2014 6:53:37 GMT -5
|
|
grayfingers
Cave Dweller
Member since November 2007
Posts: 4,575
|
Post by grayfingers on Mar 19, 2014 7:06:34 GMT -5
I think the 2nd pdf may be about a different formation oopps (McDermott)
|
|
|
Post by gingerkid on Mar 19, 2014 7:08:07 GMT -5
Really like your macro-shots of the unusual coral, jamesp. Very nice trade with quartz. The sunstones are beautiful!
|
|