bushmanbilly
Cave Dweller
Member since October 2008
Posts: 4,719
|
Post by bushmanbilly on Apr 23, 2014 18:16:55 GMT -5
“Awesome” chart, Bushman. Now tell us why de temps has rised while de solar irradiance thingie went down. Recently. Like the last thirty years. Or so. Oh, and I almost forgot – Where’d ya find the chart about Neptune? Uranus, right? You pulled the pen out. The summations were made over 1598 data months therefore use all the digits in the constants to ensure the correlation is maintained over the data set. The correlation can be used to predict future temperature changes and reconstruct past temperature fluctuations outside the correlated data set if monthly sunspot numbers are provided as input. If the sunspot number is zero in a month the correlation predicts that the Global Temperature Anomaly trend will decrease at 0.0118 degree centigrade per month. If there were no sunspots for a year the temperature would decline 0.141 degrees. If there were no Sunspots for 50 years we would be entering an ice age with a 7 degree centigrade decline. While this is unlikely to happen, it may have in the past. The correlation implies that we live a precarious existence. The correlation was used to reconstruct what the global temperature change was during the Dalton minimum in sunspot from 1793 to 1830. The correlation estimates a 0.8 degree decline over the 37 years. Australian scientists have made a prediction of sunspots by month out to 2019. The correlation estimates a decline of 0.1 degree from 2013 to 2019 using the scientists’ data. The Global temperature anomaly has already stopped rising since 1997. The formation of sunspots is a chaotic event and we can not know with any certainty the exact future value for a sunspot number in any month. There are limits that can be assumed for the Sunspot number as the sunspot number appears to take a random walk around the basic beta type curve that forms a solar cycle. The cosine term in the modeling equation attempts to evaluate the chaotic nature of sunspot formation and models the temperature effect from the statistical nature of the timing of their appearance. Some believe we are entering a Dalton type minimum. The prediction in this graph makes two assumptions. First : the Australian prediction is valid to 2019. Second: that from 2020 to 2045, the a replay of Dalton minimum will have the same sunspot numbers in each month as from may 1798 to may 1823. This of course won’t happen, but it gives an approximation of what the future trend of the Global Anomaly could be. If we entered another Dalton type minimum post 2019, the present positive Global Temperature Anomaly would be completely eliminated. wattsupwiththat.com/2013/05/03/sunspot-cycle-and-the-global-temperature-change-anomaly/
|
|
bushmanbilly
Cave Dweller
Member since October 2008
Posts: 4,719
|
Post by bushmanbilly on Apr 23, 2014 18:18:40 GMT -5
1. Stars and stripes were photo shopped over the hammer and sickle. 2. Everyone knows that Muslims only use their left hand for one thing. 3. Funny, bushman! Yeah, must be photoshopped.
What is #3? Do you think he had ham on Easter?
|
|
bushmanbilly
Cave Dweller
Member since October 2008
Posts: 4,719
|
Post by bushmanbilly on Apr 23, 2014 18:19:42 GMT -5
“Awesome” chart, Bushman. Now tell us why de temps has rised while de solar irradiance thingie went down. Recently. Like the last thirty years. Or so. Oh, and I almost forgot – Where’d ya find the chart about Neptune? Uranus, right? You pulled the pen out.
|
|
|
Post by parfive on Apr 23, 2014 18:58:07 GMT -5
Yeah, you’re grindin’ gears alright. From the top of the page you linked: ”Personally, I think the readers have it right. While interesting, this is little more than an exercise in curve fitting. – Anthony” Your boy Anthony was referring to the likes of: ”This looks like a nice example of curve fitting and bad science. FIVE empirically adjusted parameters without any physical explanation to them? I’m particularly baffled by the cosine, if a~148 and you expect the angle in radians! What the hell is that? A minuscule change in parameter a would lead to entirely different results, No surprise that you need give it with a precision of 12 decimal positions. Same for the others. This is not science, it is a joke.” So why doncha try again and use the clutch this time.
|
|
bushmanbilly
Cave Dweller
Member since October 2008
Posts: 4,719
|
Post by bushmanbilly on Apr 23, 2014 19:28:18 GMT -5
Yeah, you’re grindin’ gears alright. From the top of the page you linked: ”Personally, I think the readers have it right. While interesting, this is little more than an exercise in curve fitting. – Anthony” Your boy Anthony was referring to the likes of: ”This looks like a nice example of curve fitting and bad science. FIVE empirically adjusted parameters without any physical explanation to them? I’m particularly baffled by the cosine, if a~148 and you expect the angle in radians! What the hell is that? A minuscule change in parameter a would lead to entirely different results, No surprise that you need give it with a precision of 12 decimal positions. Same for the others. This is not science, it is a joke.” So why doncha try again and use the clutch this time. If you can pick and choose reader comments to your liking, so can I. You must have learned that tactic from a "normal person" johnmarshall says: May 3, 2013 at 3:54 am Interesting. The sunspot numbers will affect other solar outputs like magnetic strength. All solar outputs will affect climate on our planet. A better correlation than a trace gas vital for life.thingodonta says: May 3, 2013 at 3:49 am You can’t tax sunspots.
|
|
bushmanbilly
Cave Dweller
Member since October 2008
Posts: 4,719
|
Post by bushmanbilly on Apr 23, 2014 19:37:59 GMT -5
|
|
Sabre52
Cave Dweller
Me and my gal, Rosie
Member since August 2005
Posts: 20,456
|
Post by Sabre52 on Apr 23, 2014 20:35:01 GMT -5
*LOL* And you can't get a government grant from this administration if you are against global warming ( Oh wait, now that we're freezing our asses off, its "climate change") theory. Government douchbags mostly give money to folks and colleges who write papers that support their ideology. Start up a company like Solendra that is in their box for ideological compliance or write a paper that satisfies their mindset and it will rain government money, even if your data is faked and cherry picked or your company is ridiculously unprofitable *L*....Mel
|
|
|
Post by Rockoonz on Apr 23, 2014 23:22:36 GMT -5
You also can't get a paper published if it presents evidence against man made global warming, except for the 3% they publish to create the illusion, that they're fair minded.
|
|
|
Post by parfive on Apr 24, 2014 1:49:52 GMT -5
Freedom, baby. Just make sure you got the women up front.
|
|
|
Post by Rockoonz on Apr 24, 2014 8:18:56 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by 1dave on Apr 24, 2014 8:44:33 GMT -5
VERY INTERESTING! Truth stings the Progressive Agenda worse than a serpent's tooth!!!!!
In addition to thousands of years of world wide evidence, we now have over a hundred years of data right here in the USA of the difference in outcome between liberal and conservative ideas. The worst outcomes of cities or states by any measure are those run by Democrats. The longer the Democrats have been in control, the worse off the city or state is!
Will they admit it?
No, they continue trying to drag our nation down to third world levels, saying "It is only fair!"
Fair? Pushing more and more people into poverty and on to food stamps is fair?
After years of trying to understand the liberal mind set I've noticed that: 1. Most people who grew up in the country HAD TO learn self reliance. 2. Many people who grew up in a big city learned they could be leeches, sucking the life out of all around them. That is the difference!
|
|
|
Post by Rockoonz on Apr 24, 2014 10:27:31 GMT -5
1dave it's not Democrats, per se. Not even Liberals. It's progressives. The left side progressive builds the "utopian" dependent class, The right side facist progressive builds the police state. They invent crises to keep the masses fighting each other, while they ever so gently tighten the noose.
|
|
|
Post by parfive on Apr 24, 2014 14:14:54 GMT -5
|
|
gemfeller
Cave Dweller
Member since June 2011
Posts: 3,781
|
Post by gemfeller on Apr 24, 2014 15:27:11 GMT -5
Cool. Witness protection for domestic terrorists. It shouldn't have happened. But other domestic terrorists receive honored treatment, especially if they're from Chicago. Bill Ayers ("Guilty as hell, free as a bird") instead of going to prison became a Distinguished Professor of Education at the U. of Illinois, Chicago. And his illustrious wife, Bernardine Dohrn ("I consider myself a revolutionary Communist") was awarded the job of Clinical Associate Professor of Law at Northwestern University School of Law and held the position of Director of Northwestern's Children and Family Justice Center.
|
|
grayfingers
Cave Dweller
Member since November 2007
Posts: 4,575
|
Post by grayfingers on Apr 24, 2014 16:28:05 GMT -5
Let us not forget who launched his political career in Ayers living room. . . In 1989, Obama was a summer intern at Michelle Obama's law firm. One of Michelle's co-workers was Bernadine Dohrn. So the relationship between the Obamas and Ayers has spanned twenty years. "One of the best known contacts between Obama and Ayers was when the couple hosted a "meet and greet" for Obama at Ayers house in Hyde Park -– an upper middle class neighborhood on Chicago's south side, where Obama now lives as a neighbor of Louis Farrakhan." "I can remember being one of a small group of people who came to Bill Ayers' house to learn that Alice Palmer was stepping down from the senate and running for Congress," said Dr. Quentin Young, a prominent Chicago physician and advocate for single-payer health care, of the informal gathering at the home of Ayers and his wife, Dohrn. "[Palmer] identified [Obama] as her successor." A Chicago-based blogger named Maria Warren -- whose writing suggested she was to the left of Obama -- recalled watching the candidate give a "standard, innocuous little talk" in 1995, in the Ayers' living room when Obama was running for the state Senate. "They were launching him," Warren wrote, "introducing him to the Hyde Park community as the best thing since sliced bread." Although Team Obama has repeatedly denied the Ayers' "meet and greet," in an interview with the Daily Beast, Ayers recalled that fundraiser. www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/04/liar-in-chief-bill-ayers-confirms-obamas-explosive-career-started-in-his-living-room/
|
|
|
Post by 1dave on Apr 25, 2014 9:06:24 GMT -5
1dave it's not Democrats, per se. Not even Liberals. It's progressives. The left side progressive builds the "utopian" dependent class, The right side facist progressive builds the police state. They invent crises to keep the masses fighting each other, while they ever so gently tighten the noose. RIGHT! And they invade every power position possible, Democrat, Republican, Business CEO, School Principal, Police Captain, Dog catcher . . .
|
|