wpotterw
spending too much on rocks
Member since September 2016
Posts: 442
|
Post by wpotterw on Sept 22, 2024 6:38:57 GMT -5
James, do you treat people and do you do it for a fee? Just wondering. You must have helped a lot of people. No, I do not treat people. Have not been in that aspect of medicine in a long time.
I did make herbal formulas for a long time, but nowadays primarily do medical consultations with people around the world. I work strictly on donation, and always have so those who cannot afford anything can still receive help. So, I can guide people, but if people are really serious, they will put forth some effort in the process of healing themselves. I learned the hard way helping people for free by making formulas for them, and even providing them devices, and they did not follow through wasting my time and money. So, I only guide people now.
I have helped a lot of cancer patients, some AIDS patients, diabetics, asthmatics, people with autoimmune conditions, people with heart issues, etc. Most medicine is not all that complicated. The problem is that doctors these days are being taught outdated crap from decades to 100 years ago such as the myths that acid reflux is from excess stomach acid, osteoporosis is from a loss of bone minerals that is actually osteopenia and osteomalacia, that autoimmunity is the result of an overactive immune system, that AIDS is a disease when it is a syndrome (thus the big "S" in AIDS), that diabetes is the result of pancreatic failure when that in only the case in some types and there are non-sugar forms of diabetes, that antibody test and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) confirm vital infections when in fact neither do. In fact, there is no common lab test that can confirm the presence of any particular viruses. These are just some examples.
Doctors rarely do independent research or use rational thought to discover and understand these facts. For example, I was the first person to explain how low stomach acid is the primary cause of acid reflux (GERD), which I first proposed over 30 years ago. And it is not hard to back with a little basic research, since hyperchlorhydria (excess stomach acid), according to the medical journals is so rare that it is almost unheard of. Furthermore, if excess stomach acid that also has proteolytic enzymes mixed in was coming up the esophagus, this poses some super serious risks immediately including deadly hemorrhage from esophageal varices, and the risk as aspiration pneumonia and severe lung damage. A person would end up in the hospital each time they had acid reflux. And we know that antacids and proton pump inhibitors, among other side effects such as significantly increased risk of numerous diseases and conditions such as cancer, also increases the frequency of acid reflux bouts because they reduce stomach acidity. This inhibits proper digestion and promotes fermentation. The resultant gas formed puts pressure on the LES until it is forced to relax, and the gas and TRACES of stomach acid race up the esophagus, which is the acid reflux. All of this should not require studies for doctors to understand. Just applying some simple, basic rational thought should lead them to understand this fact.
The other issue I have is that doctors are rarely trained in eliminating disease. Their main training is to mask symptoms. This is why they cannot reverse allergies, asthma, diabetes, osteoporosis, AIDS, heart disease, etc. when the holistic community has been doing it for a very long time. The key to curing diseases or conditions starts with properly understanding the disease or conditions. For example, if they cannot even properly define diabetes, which literally means "excessive urination" and not high blood sugar, the how do they expect to reverse it when they clearly do not understand i? One of the few areas they are pretty successful with is with countering a lot of bacterial infections with antibiotics, Although, this has become much more difficult with all the antibiotics in our food and water leading to antibiotic resistant strains of bacteria. Luckily we have a vast range of herbal antibiotics, and other holistic antibacterial sources such as ozone therapy.
The other area, they are somewhat good at as far as disease treatment is with cancer treatment. Although, this wildly varies from 0% success rate up to 80% success rate for a couple of cancers, such as leukemias and lymphomas. The reason leukemias and lymphomas are so responsive is because these cancers, as with the majority of cancers, have been linked to viruses, and the chemotherapy drugs used to treat these cancers are powerful antiviral drugs derived directly from herbs, such as Vincristine and Vinblastine derived from the herb Madagascar periwinkle, or originally derived from herbs, but now synthesized for profit making reasons since the natural compound cannot be patented, such as the podophyllumtoxin derivatives. The podophyllumtoxin derivatives used to treat these cancers, were originally derived from mandrake root, then later Savin junipers, and were reported back in the 1950s in JAMA and JACS to be "highly effective" for 6 forms of cancer tested including breast cancer. It could not be patented for profit though, and so was not used. It was not until over 50 years later that the University of North Carolina patented the compound an d sold it to a California drug company. Then it took about another 13 or so years to get it to market. How many people died from these curable cancers in that over 60 years they sat on a known cure for cancer? Actually we have highly effective, proven cancer cures that have been around longer than that, which still are not used by "modern medicine" such as ozone therapy (started 1892), and herbs such as pau d' arco (lapacho), chaparral, chaga, etc, that have been used very successfully for cancer treatments for thousands of years.
Although, up until very recently, most doctors were not even aware of cancer viruses, even though they have been known since 1902, because they are not taught this stuff in medical school, and the information was being suppressed. For example, several decades ago I was posting on the American Leukemia/Lymphoma Societies message board. I brought up the proven fact that leukemias and lymphomas were viral in origin, which have been widely discussed in the medical journals. Some asshat decided to attack me over my statement and made a comment about I should tell hos doctor about this since his doctor never heard of these leukemia and lymphoma viruses, which by the way includes the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV, human T-cell leukemia/lymphoma virus type 3 HTLV3). So, I responded with I would find a new doctor since these leukemia/lymphoma viruses have been well known and reported in the medical journals for over 25 years, at that time. The American Leukemia and Lymphoma Society immediately deleted all my posts and suspended my account, while leaving all the posts calling me a quack up despite violating their terms of service. They did not want people knowing the link between these cancers and viruses since we have a wide range of highly effective antivirals that can readily cure these cancers, which means they would be out of business raising money supposedly looking for a cure when so many already exist. For example, I saw a little boy I recommended pau d' arco to reverse his leukemia in 2 weeks, and I have seen 4 AIDS patients reverse symptoms within days to weeks using the same herb. Pau d' arco contains 18 antiviral anthraquinones and napthaquinones among other active components.
The claim that different cancers need different treatments is complete BS, and again is based om making money. All cancers for example have an Achilles's heel in the fact that they are peroxide intolerant due to the lack of catalase and peroxidases present in healthy cells. This makes all cancer cells highly vulnerable to ozone therapy, which generates both hydrogen peroxide, and more importantly lipid peroxides. The peroxides enter healthy and cancer cells, but healthy cells use catalase and peroxidases to decompose the peroxide in to water and oxygen. Peroxides entering cancer cells cannot be broken down, and thus swell and burst the cancer cells selectively. The oxygen formed by the enzymatic decomposition by healthy cells is in the form of an oxygen radical, which creates even more lipid peroxide, thus destroying cancer cells in a chain reaction until the oxygen radicals are all stabilized by other reactions. In addition, ozone therapy destroys cancer pathogens, increases levels of anti-cancer cytokines, increases levels of anti-cancer superoxide dismutase, destroys many carcinogens, reduces the fuel source lactate, and can inhibit metastases by reducing protons. Because ozone therapy increases levels of catalase and peroxidases in healthy cells, it does not harm healthy tissue or blood cells at proper levels. There are all sorts of medical studies on the benefits of ozone therapy for cancer and numerous other diseases and conditions that can be found on PubMed.
Hav you ever heard of this guy? www.drbillmcgraw.com/ - A person I work with says he cured her 70+ year-old sister. She was told by her oncologist that there wasnothing else that could be done medically. She says her sister was in bad shape but is now cancer-free and has renewed vigor, and has rejoined the workforce.
|
|
|
Post by vegasjames on Sept 22, 2024 6:59:24 GMT -5
No, I do not treat people. Have not been in that aspect of medicine in a long time.
I did make herbal formulas for a long time, but nowadays primarily do medical consultations with people around the world. I work strictly on donation, and always have so those who cannot afford anything can still receive help. So, I can guide people, but if people are really serious, they will put forth some effort in the process of healing themselves. I learned the hard way helping people for free by making formulas for them, and even providing them devices, and they did not follow through wasting my time and money. So, I only guide people now.
I have helped a lot of cancer patients, some AIDS patients, diabetics, asthmatics, people with autoimmune conditions, people with heart issues, etc. Most medicine is not all that complicated. The problem is that doctors these days are being taught outdated crap from decades to 100 years ago such as the myths that acid reflux is from excess stomach acid, osteoporosis is from a loss of bone minerals that is actually osteopenia and osteomalacia, that autoimmunity is the result of an overactive immune system, that AIDS is a disease when it is a syndrome (thus the big "S" in AIDS), that diabetes is the result of pancreatic failure when that in only the case in some types and there are non-sugar forms of diabetes, that antibody test and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) confirm vital infections when in fact neither do. In fact, there is no common lab test that can confirm the presence of any particular viruses. These are just some examples.
Doctors rarely do independent research or use rational thought to discover and understand these facts. For example, I was the first person to explain how low stomach acid is the primary cause of acid reflux (GERD), which I first proposed over 30 years ago. And it is not hard to back with a little basic research, since hyperchlorhydria (excess stomach acid), according to the medical journals is so rare that it is almost unheard of. Furthermore, if excess stomach acid that also has proteolytic enzymes mixed in was coming up the esophagus, this poses some super serious risks immediately including deadly hemorrhage from esophageal varices, and the risk as aspiration pneumonia and severe lung damage. A person would end up in the hospital each time they had acid reflux. And we know that antacids and proton pump inhibitors, among other side effects such as significantly increased risk of numerous diseases and conditions such as cancer, also increases the frequency of acid reflux bouts because they reduce stomach acidity. This inhibits proper digestion and promotes fermentation. The resultant gas formed puts pressure on the LES until it is forced to relax, and the gas and TRACES of stomach acid race up the esophagus, which is the acid reflux. All of this should not require studies for doctors to understand. Just applying some simple, basic rational thought should lead them to understand this fact.
The other issue I have is that doctors are rarely trained in eliminating disease. Their main training is to mask symptoms. This is why they cannot reverse allergies, asthma, diabetes, osteoporosis, AIDS, heart disease, etc. when the holistic community has been doing it for a very long time. The key to curing diseases or conditions starts with properly understanding the disease or conditions. For example, if they cannot even properly define diabetes, which literally means "excessive urination" and not high blood sugar, the how do they expect to reverse it when they clearly do not understand i? One of the few areas they are pretty successful with is with countering a lot of bacterial infections with antibiotics, Although, this has become much more difficult with all the antibiotics in our food and water leading to antibiotic resistant strains of bacteria. Luckily we have a vast range of herbal antibiotics, and other holistic antibacterial sources such as ozone therapy.
The other area, they are somewhat good at as far as disease treatment is with cancer treatment. Although, this wildly varies from 0% success rate up to 80% success rate for a couple of cancers, such as leukemias and lymphomas. The reason leukemias and lymphomas are so responsive is because these cancers, as with the majority of cancers, have been linked to viruses, and the chemotherapy drugs used to treat these cancers are powerful antiviral drugs derived directly from herbs, such as Vincristine and Vinblastine derived from the herb Madagascar periwinkle, or originally derived from herbs, but now synthesized for profit making reasons since the natural compound cannot be patented, such as the podophyllumtoxin derivatives. The podophyllumtoxin derivatives used to treat these cancers, were originally derived from mandrake root, then later Savin junipers, and were reported back in the 1950s in JAMA and JACS to be "highly effective" for 6 forms of cancer tested including breast cancer. It could not be patented for profit though, and so was not used. It was not until over 50 years later that the University of North Carolina patented the compound an d sold it to a California drug company. Then it took about another 13 or so years to get it to market. How many people died from these curable cancers in that over 60 years they sat on a known cure for cancer? Actually we have highly effective, proven cancer cures that have been around longer than that, which still are not used by "modern medicine" such as ozone therapy (started 1892), and herbs such as pau d' arco (lapacho), chaparral, chaga, etc, that have been used very successfully for cancer treatments for thousands of years.
Although, up until very recently, most doctors were not even aware of cancer viruses, even though they have been known since 1902, because they are not taught this stuff in medical school, and the information was being suppressed. For example, several decades ago I was posting on the American Leukemia/Lymphoma Societies message board. I brought up the proven fact that leukemias and lymphomas were viral in origin, which have been widely discussed in the medical journals. Some asshat decided to attack me over my statement and made a comment about I should tell hos doctor about this since his doctor never heard of these leukemia and lymphoma viruses, which by the way includes the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV, human T-cell leukemia/lymphoma virus type 3 HTLV3). So, I responded with I would find a new doctor since these leukemia/lymphoma viruses have been well known and reported in the medical journals for over 25 years, at that time. The American Leukemia and Lymphoma Society immediately deleted all my posts and suspended my account, while leaving all the posts calling me a quack up despite violating their terms of service. They did not want people knowing the link between these cancers and viruses since we have a wide range of highly effective antivirals that can readily cure these cancers, which means they would be out of business raising money supposedly looking for a cure when so many already exist. For example, I saw a little boy I recommended pau d' arco to reverse his leukemia in 2 weeks, and I have seen 4 AIDS patients reverse symptoms within days to weeks using the same herb. Pau d' arco contains 18 antiviral anthraquinones and napthaquinones among other active components.
The claim that different cancers need different treatments is complete BS, and again is based om making money. All cancers for example have an Achilles's heel in the fact that they are peroxide intolerant due to the lack of catalase and peroxidases present in healthy cells. This makes all cancer cells highly vulnerable to ozone therapy, which generates both hydrogen peroxide, and more importantly lipid peroxides. The peroxides enter healthy and cancer cells, but healthy cells use catalase and peroxidases to decompose the peroxide in to water and oxygen. Peroxides entering cancer cells cannot be broken down, and thus swell and burst the cancer cells selectively. The oxygen formed by the enzymatic decomposition by healthy cells is in the form of an oxygen radical, which creates even more lipid peroxide, thus destroying cancer cells in a chain reaction until the oxygen radicals are all stabilized by other reactions. In addition, ozone therapy destroys cancer pathogens, increases levels of anti-cancer cytokines, increases levels of anti-cancer superoxide dismutase, destroys many carcinogens, reduces the fuel source lactate, and can inhibit metastases by reducing protons. Because ozone therapy increases levels of catalase and peroxidases in healthy cells, it does not harm healthy tissue or blood cells at proper levels. There are all sorts of medical studies on the benefits of ozone therapy for cancer and numerous other diseases and conditions that can be found on PubMed.
Hav you ever heard of this guy? www.drbillmcgraw.com/ - A person I work with says he cured her 70+ year-old sister. She was told by her oncologist that there wasnothing else that could be done medically. She says her sister was in bad shape but is now cancer-free and has renewed vigor, and has rejoined the workforce. Link is not working. I get page not found.
|
|
RockyBeach
spending too much on rocks
Member since July 2023
Posts: 342
|
Post by RockyBeach on Sept 22, 2024 12:53:54 GMT -5
Sunrise with color enhanced by western wildfires
|
|
wpotterw
spending too much on rocks
Member since September 2016
Posts: 442
|
Post by wpotterw on Sept 22, 2024 15:09:57 GMT -5
Hav you ever heard of this guy? www.drbillmcgraw.com/ - A person I work with says he cured her 70+ year-old sister. She was told by her oncologist that there wasnothing else that could be done medically. She says her sister was in bad shape but is now cancer-free and has renewed vigor, and has rejoined the workforce. Link is not working. I get page not found. Probably need to drop the slash
|
|
|
Post by vegasjames on Sept 22, 2024 17:46:45 GMT -5
Link is not working. I get page not found. Probably need to drop the slash That worked. I was just clicking the link before.
Looks like he is mainly working with the Spooky 2, which is a radio frequency device. I have never looked in depth in to these devices, but I see they are adding Rife's name to it, which I totally disagree that this is Rife technology. It is actually more closely aligned with Lakhovsky than Rife.
Radiofrequency therapy is nothing new. Tesla actually started this back in the 1800s, then Lakhovsky did his version in 1908, then Moray and Rife in 1932.
Rife is the bet known for this due to a book put out by Barry Lynes called A Cure for All Cancers, which chronicled the history of Rife's work on his microscope that is still superior to today's electron microscopes, and his radiofrequency therapy that was used to successfully cure cancers and other diseases.
I have been working with Rife technology for over 30 years and have seen it work for a variety of cancers, MS, MD, nerve pain and regeneration, SFS, fibromalgia, etc. Although, Rife did not fully understand how his device really worked, and people since have really bastardized his research which has led to a lot of quack devices hitting the market based on a bogus 11 page frequency list that has been circulating for decades. Contrary to the stories out there, Rife did not have hundreds of different frequencies, he had 6. He later dropped 3 because he felt they interfered with the first 3. Of the remaining 3, tow of them were off by 1, which explains why they were so much slower to work. Making the corrections on those frequencies, they worked just as well. There is a relationship between those frequencies, which also explains why they worked and any one of those frequencies would work for any cancer and various diseases. Different frequencies were not needed for different diseases as Rife thought, and is still the story today. I have seen the same frequency work on a wide range of cancers and other diseases and conditions. I was not the one that figured this out though, so it is not my place to give up m father's research, who is the one that actually figured this out and how the Rife units actually worked, which is not how Rife suspected. In fact, the devices can do things that cannot be explained by Rife's hypothesis.
Although, I still prefer ozone therapy to Rife units in almost all cases. The Rife units do have their limitations such as not being as effective in cancer patients who have undergone radiation therapy, and some devices not good to use with people with metal implants. Ozone therapy is faster, more effective and does not have these limitations.
|
|
|
Post by jasoninsd on Sept 22, 2024 20:45:57 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by miket on Sept 23, 2024 8:50:16 GMT -5
Went hounding today with my wife out at Railroad Buttes (Buffalo Gap National Grasslands, South Dakota). My wife said the hill in that first pic looked like "Boob Hill"! LOL Nice hill, jasoninsd...any Fairburns?
|
|
rockbrain
Cave Dweller
Member since January 2022
Posts: 3,095
Member is Online
|
Post by rockbrain on Sept 23, 2024 9:07:53 GMT -5
Photo of the night - Night-blooming Cereus I think it only happens once a year, that we actually remember to go back out before bed & actually see the bloom.
They only bloom for one night and it smells wonderful. The bloom is 4-5" across.
Patty
Beautiful shot. We went out to see those in the middle of the night when I lived in Bermuda.
|
|
RockyBeach
spending too much on rocks
Member since July 2023
Posts: 342
|
Post by RockyBeach on Sept 23, 2024 10:26:34 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by miket on Sept 24, 2024 8:51:41 GMT -5
Mornin
|
|
RockyBeach
spending too much on rocks
Member since July 2023
Posts: 342
|
Post by RockyBeach on Sept 24, 2024 10:15:00 GMT -5
miket Great picture ! It looks like that light pole is holding up the cloud ceiling !
|
|
RockyBeach
spending too much on rocks
Member since July 2023
Posts: 342
|
Post by RockyBeach on Sept 24, 2024 10:18:02 GMT -5
Contrails
|
|
|
Post by jasoninsd on Sept 25, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5
Went hounding today with my wife out at Railroad Buttes (Buffalo Gap National Grasslands, South Dakota). My wife said the hill in that first pic looked like "Boob Hill"! LOL Nice hill, jasoninsd ...any Fairburns? A couple "Near-burns"! LOL
|
|
|
Post by vegasjames on Sept 25, 2024 17:17:52 GMT -5
|
|
RockyBeach
spending too much on rocks
Member since July 2023
Posts: 342
|
Post by RockyBeach on Sept 25, 2024 17:45:14 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by jasoninsd on Sept 25, 2024 20:36:22 GMT -5
vegasjames - Those first two pictures look like they're taken looking straight up...and Jax is "Spider-dog"! LOL
|
|
|
Post by victor1941 on Sept 26, 2024 8:21:51 GMT -5
Vegasjames, is that a kiln with refractory bricks?
|
|
|
Post by vegasjames on Sept 26, 2024 8:49:18 GMT -5
Vegasjames, is that a kiln or refractory? Yes, they are rotary kilns for gypsum processing. So, they are lined with refractory fire bricks. Based on the weight of each one of those bricks, I would guess alumina bricks rather than magnesia bricks.
|
|
|
Post by victor1941 on Sept 26, 2024 9:42:12 GMT -5
Vegasjames, I would never have guessed different refractory bricks.
|
|
|
Post by amygdule on Sept 26, 2024 10:23:36 GMT -5
Vegasjames, is that a kiln or refractory? Yes, they are rotary kilns for gypsum processing. So, they are lined with refractory fire bricks. Based on the weight of each one of those bricks, I would guess alumina bricks rather than magnesia bricks. Nice photos of the kiln. I thought that looked familiar. I used to be a Lime Kiln operator at a paper mill. Cooking mud into Hot Lime. Then mixing with a Sodium Carbonate solution to make the Sodium Hydroxide used to cook wood chips into fiber. Rinse & Repeat all day long...
|
|